play blackjack 247 dhnc

Free Casino Spins In Kenya d into signing it?‘Conclude before you even check’ also extends to quoting the GRA’s rules to the GRA. Well, not quite. If you take the trouble to visit our website and read our rules, you will see that the GRA is not the Gibraltar gambling regulator. The GRA has had nothing to do with us for nearly three years. So all those who tell us what our rules say appear to have not even looked at them, as they make explicit that the Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner is the Gibraltar regulator, and publishes the rules, known as RTOS (Remote Technical and Operating Standards), and how they are to be applied in such circumstances. roulette game c++ free slots buffalo Can I take you seriously if you don’t read your own threads, don’t read what I have written, don’t know who we are, or read what our rules are, but you agree with the supercilious, aggrandised egomaniacs who splash their opinions on the thread as if they had access to the relevant data, coupled with infallible judgement and had done their own homework?So what do our rules say? online poker slots free Ignition Poker Online Review Gkgs They do say games should not be ‘adaptive’ ie , “the probability of any particular outcome occurring should be the same every time the game is played, except as provided for in the (fair) rules of the game. online poker 24 7 ” So the games were not adaptive as we or any other regulator defines that term. raging bull best bonus codes Roulette Casino Gain 0 Evfo

As the outcome of every call was entirely random, albeit weighted against the player, the game is not adaptive. Note that the game was approved for use in all the European raging bull slots free codesjurisdictions which licence online slot play. Then we have the assertions about the game representing a device. Well, where is that rule? bitcoin casino europe Indeed, where is that card game that uses 12 of 13 cards in this way and with these bets? tangiers casino similar monopoly slots free coins hack 2022 konami slots play for fun The claim that it breaks an imaginary US or European rule is a complete nonsense. Read RTOS, you will not find the so-called rule you are told the game breaches; not in our rules or any other remote gambling rules (I am familiar with most of them). You might think such a rule exists, and it does for certain specified circumstances, but not for these circumstances. vip deluxe slots cheats Best Bitcoin Casino Uk Qdim

Key Insights and Expert Analysis

Read our RTOS section 7. 1(5). What you will see is: “A licence holder should not implement game designs or features that may reasonably be expected to mislead the customer about the likelihood of particular results occurring. slots village review This includes, but is not limited to the following:………”It is my office which has to decide if what occurred amounted to an operator breaching that rule. free blackjack practice unblocked australian syndicate casino The answer is no, because the evidence, precedent, and a common sense interpretation say no. The examples which we go on to use refer to ‘simulates physical devices’. HiLo/Reel Deal does not simulate a physical device, it is a bespoke slot game. video slot machine japanese Even if this rule did apply, which it does not, we still have to apply a ‘reasonableness test’ in terms of how or why the rule was breached. casino bonus 200

You cannot look at a game 10 years after it has been introduced and after millions and millions raging bull slots free codesof plays without any challenge, which has been accepted in numerous jurisdictions, and then say – that game is misleading everyone, because it obviously isn’t. What happened was the introduction of a paytable error, not the creation of an unfair game. We have taken sufficient and proportionate action with regard to that error, consistent with the likely actions of any other regulator presented with a similar error. civ 6 free slots for great works 21 Blackjack App Zlcr This conclusion also impacts on the calls for reimbursement. Reimburse who, back to when, what for? Are you seriously saying the operator